Torrens University Australia

File(s) stored somewhere else

Please note: Linked content is NOT stored on Torrens University Australia and we can't guarantee its availability, quality, security or accept any liability.

Should we screen for frailty in primary care settings? A fresh perspective on the frailty evidence base: A narrative review

journal contribution
posted on 2019-01-18, 03:50 authored by Rachel AmbagtsheerRachel Ambagtsheer, Justin BeilbyJustin Beilby, Renuka VisvanathanRenuka Visvanathan, Elsa DentElsa Dent, Solomon YuSolomon Yu, Annette Braunack-Mayer

With older adults living longer, health service providers have increasingly turned their attention towards frailty and its significant consequences for health and well-being. Consequently, frailty screening has gained momentum as a possible health policy answer to the question of what can be done to prevent frailty's onset and progression. However, who should be screened for frailty, where and when remains a subject of extensive debate. The purpose of this narrative review is to explore the dimensions of this question with reference to Wilson and Jungner's time-tested and widely accepted principles for acceptable screening within community settings. Although the balance of the emerging evidence to support frailty screening is promising, significant gaps in the evidence base remain. Consequently, when assessed against Wilson and Jungner's principles, extensive population screening does not appear to be supported by the evidence. However, screening for the purpose of case-finding may prove useful among older adults.

Preventative Medicine. 2018 Dec 27;119:63-69.


Year of publication